header-logo header-logo

08 April 2020 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7882 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

An extraordinary Act of Parliament

18953
Michael Zander on the Coronavirus Act 2020
  • A Government amendment allows for a Commons vote every six months as to whether the Act should continue in force.
  • Despite time constraints, both the Lords Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee and the Lords Constitution Committee had the time to produce reports.

‘Coronavirus is the most serious public health emergency that has faced the world in a century. . . To defeat it, we are proposing extraordinary measures of a kind never seen before in peacetime.’ (Secretary of State, Matt Hancock, 23 March, HoC, col 35)

The Coronavirus Act has 102 sections (72pp) and 29 Schedules (275pp)—a total of 347 pages. It was introduced in the Commons on Thursday 19 March; went through all its stages in the House of Commons on Monday 23 March; was introduced and had its 2nd Reading in the Lords on 24 March; went through its remaining stages on 25 March and received Royal Assent the same day.

Mr Hancock told the Commons: ‘The Bill has been drafted over a long period,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll