header-logo header-logo

03 February 2012 / Stephen Hockman
Issue: 7499 / Categories: Opinion , Environment
printer mail-detail

Adverse consequences

Stephen Hockman QC condemns government manoeuvres to restrict affordable access to environmental justice

The importance of an appropriate legal framework for the protection of the environment should, in this day and age, need no emphasis. There are two aspects of this framework. The first is the system of public law under which decisions by public authorities that, unlawfully or irrationally, fail to protect our environment can be challenged by way of judicial review. The ability to bring such judicial review challenges has been held by the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords (the predecessor of the Supreme Court) as essential to secure compliance with our obligations under the European Convention of Human Rights. The UK is also a party to the so-called AARHUS Convention, which requires that such challenges can be brought without prohibitive expense, a duty which, according to a recent decision of the AARHUS compliance committee, the UK is already failing to meet.

Of equal importance is the ability of a citizen or a group of citizens to bring private law proceedings (usually based on the tort of environmental nuisance) for compensation and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll