header-logo header-logo

25 September 2009 / Ruth Cabeza
Issue: 7386 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Adoption without borders?

Ruth Cabeza considers the changing landscape for international adoptions

The case of Re A (A Child) [2009] EWCA Civ 41, 3 All ER 479 considered how the law can facilitate a child’s adoption, by prospective adopters who live outside this jurisdiction.

Readers who are familiar with domestic adoption will know that an adoption order can only be made in this country to prospective adoptive parents domiciled in this jurisdiction and who have lived for not less than a year at the time of issue. That is a problem for people who live elsewhere, but who wish to adopt a child living here. Such people need to adopt the child in their own country.

However, to protect children from slavery and child trafficking and to promote their welfare, English law does not permit the casual movement of children, out of this country for the purpose of adoption overseas. Section 84 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 (ACA 2002) does, however, facilitate the lawful removal of children from the UK for the purpose of adoption overseas, and provides for the making of an order

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll