header-logo header-logo

16 September 2019 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7856 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Acting up: will the government abide by the law?

Michael Zander QC traces the Benn Bill’s speedy progress to the statute book

  • The European Union (Withdrawal) (No 2) Act 2019.
  • Procedure was at the heart of the battle between the promoters of the Bill and its opponents.

The European Union (Withdrawal) (No 6) Bill was introduced by Hilary Benn (Labour MP for Leeds Central, pictured) at 3.13pm on Wednesday 4 September. It received Royal Assent on Monday 9 September at 3.18pm.

From ‘No 6 Bill‘, it became ‘No 2 Act’—because it was the second Act with that name to be passed in 2019. The first, the so-called Cooper-Letwin Bill, which also was rushed through all its stages in April, required the then prime minister, Theresa May, to seek an Art 50 extension beyond 12 April 2019. In the event she ended by agreeing to an extension until 31 October. (See ‘Brexit: is MPs taking control a good or a bad thing?’ NLJ, 3 May 2019, p13).

The cross-party sponsors

The Benn Bill was a cross-party effort. The 11 sponsors included former

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll