header-logo header-logo

02 May 2019 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7838 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Brexit: is MPs taking control a good or a bad thing?

Michael Zander considers the extremely controversial EU (Withdrawal) (No 5) Bill

  • Many argued that MPs taking control of the legislative process set a dangerous precedent; but is it what the exceptional circumstances of Brexit demanded?

The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2019, which started as the European Union (Withdrawal) (No 5) Bill, will surely figure in the next edition of Erskine May: Parliamentary Practice . The Bill was rushed through all its parliamentary stages. Though very unusual, that has happened before. But what was unprecedented was to have a Private Members Bill running to a timetable set by backbenchers that reached the statute book despite the opposition of the government.

No such thing has ever occurred in the more than 100 years since 1902 when the House of Commons Standing Order giving precedence to government business was first established. The House of Lords Constitution Committee’s 2009 report on fast-track legislation did not even mention the possibility that it might be the work of backbenchers opposed by government;

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll