header-logo header-logo

26 February 2025
Issue: 8106 / Categories: Legal News , Competition , Collective action , Litigation funding , Consumer
printer mail-detail

£200m Mastercard settlement confirmed

The Competition Appeals Tribunal (CAT) has approved the £200m settlement between Mastercard and Walter Merricks, in a claim initially valued at £14bn.

Merricks acted as class representative in the opt-out collective proceedings against the bank over multilateral interchange fees charged by Mastercard between 1992 and 2007. The settlement, agreed in December, was challenged by litigation funder Innsworth Capital as too low.

Approving the settlement last week, however, CAT member Hodge Malek KC said: ‘Mr Merricks has tirelessly fought for the benefit of class members over the last eight years and that is appreciated.

‘The fact that the outcome has been disappointing in the light of how the evidence and the rulings had developed does not detract from that.’

Merricks’ solicitor, Boris Bronfentrinker, partner at Willkie Farr & Gallagher, said: ‘These proceedings started off as a landmark case in setting the foundation for collective actions in the UK and it will end being as equally ground-breaking in a settlement achieved under heavy attack and challenge by the litigation funder.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll