header-logo header-logo

Judicial review

Subscribe

Achieving judicial diversity may require more work than is envisaged, suggests Geoffrey Bindman QC

Keith Davies turns the spotlight onto a Thameside Tudor tiff

David Burrows & John Eames continue their review of how & when the errors of Upper Tribunal judges can be checked

Angus Nurse welcomes proposals to reform the public services ombudsmen

Natsai Manyarara examines the amenability of judicial review of the Upper Tribunal

Time waits for no man…but might make an exception for bugs, observe John Doherty & Stephen Hackett

Robert Rhodes QC on avoiding the risk of judicial review when chairing a disciplinary tribunal

Francesca Richmond reports on local authorities successfully challenging government cuts to the school building budget

In an increasingly super-sized world, it is refreshing, and surprising, to find something that has got slimmer. The fifth edition of Michael Fordham QC’s now-seminal Judicial Review Handbook has achieved that rare distinction

JFS pupil selection: race discrimination or religious freedom? asks Craig Rose

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll