header-logo header-logo

No room for doubt

27 January 2012 / Keith Davies
Issue: 7498 / Categories: Features , Judicial review , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

Keith Davies turns the spotlight onto a Thameside Tudor tiff

The Court of Appeal heard and decided an appeal on 24 June 2011 between Garner and Others (appellant) and Elmbridge Borough Council and Others (respondent), with Gladedale Group Ltd and Network Rail Infrastructure (interested parties) (Garner and Ors v Elmbridge Borough Council and Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 891). The appellant had brought proceedings for judicial review of a decision by the council as local planning authority to grant permission for development at Hampton Court station at East Molesey in Surrey, situated on the south bank of the Thames directly opposite Hampton Court Palace. Ouseley J, in the administrative court of the Queen’s Bench Division, dismissed the application, and the appellant appealed, again unsuccessfully. The judgments do full justice to the presentation and analysis by all parties of the legal issues and the planning problems involved, which are complex (maybe more so in theory than practice).

Part of that complexity comes from the fact that the appellant, Keith Garner, with a distinguished career in giving expert advice to owners of outstanding

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll