header-logo header-logo

richard_langley_lsla_and_bircham_dyson_bell_2014

Richard Langley

Head of litigation

Richard Langley is head of litigation at Bircham Dyson Bell LLP & a committee member of the London Solicitors Litigation Association

Head of litigation

Richard Langley is head of litigation at Bircham Dyson Bell LLP & a committee member of the London Solicitors Litigation Association

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

Legal challenges to solicitors’ bills seem set to increase, says Richard Langley

Abolishing renewal hearings may tackle the appeals backlog, but at what price? Richard Langley reports

Simplifying procedures not lowering GHRs is the best way to contain litigation costs, says Richard Langley

Reviews spell more change for litigators, says Richard Langley

Why should you have to sue in the Commercial Court to avoid costs budgeting, asks Richard Langley

Recent trends in disclosure: no change? asks Richard Langley

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll