header-logo header-logo

profile-sm_7

Andrew Keogh

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

VIOLENT CRIME REDUCTION ACT 2006

The government’s latest criminal justice reforms could be a recipe for disaster, says Andrew Keogh

LEGAL AID REFORM >>
ADVOCATES QUALITY ASSURANCE >>
ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA >>
LATEST CRIMINAL CASES >>

Criminal Justice Act 2003 - Dangerous and confused? Bad character - identification issues and harsh words, Drink, guns and mobile phones, Pre-charge bail powers

Ambush defences not to be tolerated, Crediting of time on remand, Sentencing principles, New drug testing powers for police

VIOLENT CRIME REDUCTION ACT 2006 >>
DISCLOSURE NOTICES >>
CASE DIGEST >>

ASBOS
HEARSAY EVIDENCE
MEANING OF LIVING ACCOMMODATION
SENTENCING
Evidence and procedure
Statutory provisions

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll