header-logo header-logo

Will Britain answer for the Palestine mandate?

259869
© NEIL HALL/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

Danny Friedman KC & Victor Kattan examine the legal case for Britain to recognise its historic responsibilities in Palestine

IN BRIEF
  • In September 2026, two years after the ICJ advisory opinion, the UK belatedly accepted that Israel’s occupation is unlawful and acted on it. 
  • A 400-page petition served on the Government in September 2025 alleging multiple internationally wrongful acts committed by Britain in Palestine between 1917 and 1948 remains unanswered.

On 8 September 2026, the foreign secretary Ed Miliband told the House of Commons that the official view of the British government is that the occupation of Palestinian territory is unlawful. He announced an import ban on settlement goods, sanctions on their financiers, and refusal of export licences that materially assist the occupation. He accepted that Palestinians in parts of the West Bank are being ethnically cleansed. Britain, he said, refuses to be a bystander.

This was significant, but it was two years too late. On 19 July 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) held that Israel’s continued presence

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Aggressive sales tactics can add up to fraudulent trading even without proof of a particular deception or financial loss
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll