header-logo header-logo

Will

17 February 2017
Issue: 7734 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Re Hayward (deceased) Kunicki and another v Hayward [2016] EWHC 3199 (Ch), [2016] All ER (D) 126 (Dec)

The Chancery Division held that, in a dispute concerning two wills (the 2008 will and the 2013 will), the 2013 will was valid. It held that the deceased had had capacity when he had signed the 2013 will and that he had known and had approved its contents. The court dismissed the defendant’s amended counterclaim for specific performance of an alleged contract, whereby the second claimant, his sister, had allegedly contracted to share the deceased’s estate equally with him. It held that, on the facts, the alleged agreement was not an enforceable contract.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

New Square Chambers—Alexander Farara

New Square Chambers—Alexander Farara

Chambers welcomes new member

NEWS

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

back-to-top-scroll