header-logo header-logo

08 July 2010 / Costa Kypre
Issue: 7425 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Voyage of discovery

Costa Kypre examines the complications of cross-border disclosure

The prospect of embarking on a cross-border e-discovery exercise is complicated by the fact that many countries around the world have widely differing legal systems and philosophies with regard to data privacy and disclosure.

The US has a very broad discovery system, whereas member states of the European Union, Canada and Asia have a much more proportionate approach to disclosure and often have very complex data privacy rules, which specifically prohibit the liberal discovery approach taken by the US legal system.

This can be especially problematic when a cross-border discovery exercise is being led from the US. Further, now that many companies have a global presence, there is often data that may be relevant to an investigation or litigation which originates in one or more European offices. Europe in particular has a long history of fiercely protecting the individual’s right to privacy, which often causes an obstacle to a US-led discovery fulfilling its discovery obligations.

Potential consequences

The consequences of violating these conflicting principles can be significant. Recent case law in Europe indicates that Member States

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll