header-logo header-logo

Vicarious liability

04 November 2010
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Various claimants v Catholic Child Welfare Society and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1106, [2010] All ER (D) 241 (Oct)

Settled authority established that the test to be applied in ascertaining whether an employer was liable for the acts of his employee was: (i) whether the employer had entrusted to the employee the performance of a task which it, the employer, had undertaken; and (ii) if so, whether there was a sufficiently close connection between the torts and the employee’s employment for it to be fair and just to hold the employer vicariously liable.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn Premium Content

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

back-to-top-scroll