In the first of two articles, Rachel Fenton and Fiona Dabell explain why the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act needs urgent review
The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 (HFEA 1990), which regulates assisted reproduction and embryo research, is under review. The issues decided by the government of 1990 were, and remain, controversial and it is unsurprising that there has been continued debate about their regulation. Contentious issues, such as posthumous pregnancy, so-called “saviour siblings”, cloning, and the withdrawal of consent to the use of embryos upon relationship breakdown have received much media attention and high profile legal challenges to HFEA 1990 have been mounted by interest groups. These have all contributed to the need to review the current legislation.
Following the birth of Louise Brown in 1978, a committee of inquiry led by philosopher Dame Mary Warnock was set up in 1982 to examine the ethical and legal implications of the new reproductive technologies that were becoming available. The committee reported in 1984 and HFEA 1990 was predicated upon its inherently libertarian recommendations. It created the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA)
