header-logo header-logo

24 October 2013
Issue: 7581 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Referral fee caution

SRA issues warning note on risky behaviour by PI lawyers

Personal injury lawyers have been cautioned against risky behaviour that could fall foul of the referral fees ban.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) fired out a warning note last week amid concerns that firms may be indulging in behaviour that flouts the 1 April ban. 

It also warned that it knows of “numerous” examples of firms complying with referral fees but potentially breaching other parts of the code of conduct.

According to the SRA, claims management companies have been asking firms to pay them a proportion of clients’ damages in return for a referral, or even to forward them the client’s damages, which may not be in the client’s best interests. 

Other potential breaches include arranging for clients to buy insurance reports or other products at inflated prices so the introducer receives a higher rate of commission, and not being sufficiently transparent about the arrangement.

Richard Collins, SRA executive director, says: “Worryingly, we are beginning to see some examples of firms that—in their desire to maintain a volume of new clients in a manner compliant with the referral fee ban—have not paid sufficient attention to compliance with the broader, and longstanding, regulatory requirements regarding referrals. We will take formal enforcement action.”

Deborah Evans, chief executive of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers, says: “We’ve always believed a ban on referral fees would be difficult to enforce but, now that a ban is in place, it is the responsibility of solicitors to ensure they are not in breach of it, the responsibility of insurers and brokers to ensure they don’t profit from any breach, and the responsibility of the SRA to ensure it is enforced.”

The warning note can be read here.

Issue: 7581 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll