header-logo header-logo

15 February 2013
Issue: 7548 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice and procedure—Payment into court—Principles to be applied

Lazari v London & Newcastle (Camden) Ltd [2013] EWHC 97 (TCC)

31 January 2013, Queen’s Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court, Akenhead J 

The Technology and Construction Court has set out principles to be applied in making an order for payment into court pursuant to CPR 3.1. 

Jonathan Lee (instructed by Charles Russell LLP) for the claimant. Jessica Stephens (instructed by Fladgate LLP) for the defendant. 

The defendant was the long leaseholder of a site in London NW1. It engaged consultants and contractors to design and construct a substantial number of luxury flats and social housing at the site. By agreement of September 2010, the defendant agreed to complete the construction of one of the flats and sell it to the claimant on a long lease. The claimant maintained that there was a continuing defect or problem in the form of excessive overheating of her flat. After initially denying liability, the defendant eventually initiated remedial works in or about mid-2012, followed by further work later the same year. The problem was still not resolved

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll