header-logo header-logo

13 November 2019 / Sinead O’Callaghan
Issue: 7864 / Categories: Opinion , Company , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Political advertising: going off message?

Sinead O’Callaghan considers the ramifications of breaching the Companies Act when directors opt to further their own political agenda

JD Wetherspoon has been accused of breaching the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) after failing to seek shareholder approval for spending on pro-Brexit messaging ahead of the 2016 referendum.

Chairman Tim Martin reportedly used company funds to finance over £90,000 worth of pro-Brexit material. In doing so, Mr Martin is likely to have been in breach of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) because pursuant to s 366 of CA 2006, political expenditure must be authorised (in the case of a company that is not a subsidiary of another company) by a resolution of the members prior to the political expenditure being incurred. 

The definition of political expenditure is found in s 365 and is expenditure incurred by a company on:

‘(a) the preparation, publication or dissemination of advertising or other promotional or publicity material (i) of whatever nature; and (ii) however published or otherwise disseminated, that at the time  of publication or dissemination, is capable of being reasonably regarded

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll