header-logo header-logo

20 September 2024
Issue: 8086 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Media , Judicial review , Fraud
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Seize & resist when ‘journalistic’ material is involved

189724

The High Court examined the law surrounding the seizure of journalistic material following execution of a search warrant, in a recent case

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Jessica Parker, partner at Corker Binning, looks in detail at this area of law, the case and the broader implications of the court’s findings.

Parker writes: ‘The case highlights the challenge faced by those subjected to searches in seeking to protect confidential material that the investigator had no power to seize.’

She notes the case ‘is likely to interest financial crime lawyers as much as their colleagues at the coalface’, given there have been more searches by the Serious Fraud Office in the past six months than in the entire tenure of the previous director.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll