header-logo header-logo

26 January 2012 / Hugh Koch
Issue: 7498 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Expert Witness , Profession , Mental health
printer mail-detail

More than skin deep?

The psychological turmoil of breast implant removal & retention, by Hugh Koch Associates

Women with breast implants made by the French manufacturers Poly Implant Prosthèse (PIP) are commencing litigation in the UK. Anxiety levels have been raised by the French government with the recommendation that these implants are removed and key discussions are taking place as to the appropriate defendants in these cases (eg manufacturer, clinics, clinicians, hospital).

Many women with PIP implants will understandably be worried about the possible implications for their physical and emotional health. These factors need to be addressed with understanding and compassion by those responsible for their treatment and care. Where litigation is sensibly entered into, the initial focus would commonly be the physical consequences of the implant and its removal. However, it is important that the psychological side of implant removal (or lack of it) is also considered appropriately, both in terms of assessment and treatment.
A duty of care exists towards those who have sought breast implant surgery and now face the need for removal of allegedly faulty implants. The litigation that may take
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll