header-logo header-logo

19 January 2023
Categories: Legal News , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail

LNB NEWS: Commons debates further amendments to Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

MPs debated further amendments to the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill on 18 January 2023 as it returned to the House of Commons for its remaining Commons stages.

Lexis®Library update: Among the amendments under consideration were a number of technical amendments proposed by the government, an opposition amendment with cross-party support requiring the Secretary of State to produce an exhaustive list of all legislation to be revoked under the sunset provision at least three months before the sunset deadline specified in the Bill, and to allow that list to be amended by Parliament, plus a number of amendments relating to protection of workers’ rights and environmental protections. Extension of the sunset deadline to 2026, as well as provisions excluding legislation within devolved competence from the sunset, were also among the amendments debated. At the time of publication the debate was ongoing. Further details to follow.

John Bell, LLM, former Schuman Trainee at the European Parliament, has commented on the debate.

To view the tabled amendments, see: Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill, As Amended (Amendment Paper) and Speaker’s provisional grouping and selection of Amendments.

To view the Commons transcript, see: Hansard, House of Commons, 18 January 2023.

John Bell has commented:

'As it concludes its remaining stages in the Commons, the REULRR Bill continues to raise issues of legal certainty. The sunset clause would create a cliff edge bonfire of thousands of items of Retained EU Law at the end of 2023 with no provision for consultation.

As confirmed by the front bench, the number of REUL on the Cabinet Office Dashboard is unknown, placing practitioners and stakeholders in unchartered waters. This is a concern since thousands of items of REUL potentially captured by the sunset clause cover EU-derived environmental, food safety, product safety, and employment rights.

The REULRR Bill contains extensive use of Henry VIII powers, taking back control to Government rather than Parliament 6 years on from the Brexit referendum. Faced with this democratic deficit, it will likely fall on the unelected House of Lords to bring a modicum of legal certainty to this deeply flawed Bill.’

For further updates via Bill Tracker, see: LNB News 23/09/2022 11.

Sources:

• Hansard, House of Commons, 18 January 2023

• Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill - Parliamentary Bills - UK Parliament

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 18 January 2023 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll