header-logo header-logo

16 June 2021
Issue: 7937 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Commercial , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Legal UK looks to Oz following trade deal

Lawyers have welcomed the UK-Australia trade deal but warned ‘practical barriers’ still exist.

The main elements of the trade deal, which could provide a template for future deals, were agreed this week and cover market access for services professionals, tariff-free goods, a cap for 15 years on tariff-free agricultural products and more work visas for people under the age of 35. A final agreement in principle will be published in the coming days. Trade between the UK and Australia is currently worth just £13.9bn and £5.4bn worth of services but the deal is seen as a gateway to the UK joining the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said the deal could create opportunities for legal professionals.

‘The two countries already have a strong foundation given the long-standing relationship between Australian and the UK legal regulators, representative bodies and professionals,’ she said. 

‘However, there are still practical barriers that prevent the realisation of the full benefit of trade in legal services between our countries. These difficulties increase costs for clients; limit international opportunities for local lawyers; and reduce the skills transfer and contribution to the local market, particularly for those without the support of larger organisations.

‘Before the negotiations, we were clear that it would be beneficial for the legal sector to have a greater variety of business structures—such as the UK LLP—available in both jurisdictions, greater recognition of professional qualifications, regardless of route to qualification and without need for additional study, as well as increased mobility options.

‘On the free flow of data provisions and the ban on data localisation, we urge the UK government to consider the specific characteristics for legal services. Legal professionals follow their own professional obligations.

‘It is important that personal data processed by law firms are well-protected and that the fundamental rights of client confidentiality and legal professional privilege (LPP) are safeguarded in such trade agreements.’

Issue: 7937 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Commercial , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll