header-logo header-logo

07 August 2026
Issue: 8173 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 7 August 2026

Costs

R (on the application of the Secretary of State for the Home Department) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission [2026] EWCA Civ 992

The Court of Appeal dismissed H7 and H15’s appeal against the Divisional Court’s decision that the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) had no power to award costs in review proceedings. The case arose from SIAC’s decision in FGF’s case that it had jurisdiction to award costs when the home secretary withdrew a naturalisation decision. The home secretary brought judicial review proceedings against SIAC to quash that decision. H7 and H15, who had their own pending costs applications before SIAC, were joined as interested parties. The Divisional Court quashed SIAC’s decision and declared that SIAC lacked power to award costs in review cases under ss 2C-2F of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission Act 1997 (the 1997 Act). The issue was whether SIAC has the power under s 2D of the 1997 Act to award costs in review proceedings. The Court of Appeal held that ss 2D(3) and (4) of the 1997 Act, properly construed, did not confer a costs jurisdiction

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Aggressive sales tactics can add up to fraudulent trading even without proof of a particular deception or financial loss
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll