header-logo header-logo

13 October 2020
Issue: 7906 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Intimidation can be ‘part of everyday life’ at Bar

Bullying, discrimination and harassment at the Bar are widespread, a study commissioned by the Bar Standards Board (BSB) has found

Experiences varied between sexual harassment, unfair treatment on the basis of protected characteristics, long-term bullying, unreasonable work demands, belittling comments and unfair work allocation. Low to medium-level incidents were the most common, particularly for people from underrepresented groups. The study uncovered a ‘shared sense’ that a barrister who wasn’t white, male and from a ‘high social grade’ was less likely to be recommended by clerks, given work by senior barristers or employed by solicitors.

In the report, 'Bullying, Discrimination and Harassment at the Bar', published this week barristers pointed out that the Bar is ‘an environment in which power is key, and the ability to dominate over other people in order to win an argument is crucial.

‘In this environment, bullying and intimidation are rife, and often seem like part of everyday life at the Bar.’ Participants said ‘this culture of bullying and aggression is often a learned behaviour pattern―many were bullied or victimised themselves as young barristers, and therefore can feel it is the norm to act this way’.

Such behaviour can have long-term consequences, such as diminished self-esteem, anxiety, health complications, lowered earning capacity and disruption of professional relationships.

Pupil barristers were the most vulnerable, participants said. Even the architecture of the Bar, with ‘warrens of small rooms and poorly lit courtyards’ producing a ‘conspiratorial’ atmosphere made it easier for bullying to happen.

The study, by YouGov, involved telephone interviews with 30 barristers and five non-barristers who had directly experienced or observed bullying, discrimination and harassment at the Bar.

However, most barristers interviewed had not formally reported their experiences, mainly due to fears for their reputation at work and future career.

The study called for a shift in culture at the Bar to encourage openness and discourage inappropriate behaviour, with a role for the BSB, Bar Council and professional networks in driving change.

BSB head of equality and access to justice, Amit Popat, said: ‘It is plain from the study that there are significant cultural factors, including power imbalances, which inhibit the reporting of bullying and harassment.’

 

 

Issue: 7906 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll