header-logo header-logo

24 October 2013
Issue: 7581 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

HLE debate

Discussion of ethics in international arbitration

Halsbury’s Law Exchange is hosting a debate on international arbitration, at 6pm on Monday 18 November at The Old Hall and Crypt in Lincoln’s Inn. Serle Court’s Khawar Qureshi QC will chair a panel to include Brick Court’s Hilary Heilbron QC, WilmerHale partner Gary Bornand Gibson Dunn partner Cyrus Benson. The topic for discussion is “This house believes that ethics in international arbitration requires no further regulation”. Entry is free and the event starts at 6pm. Light refreshments will be served. To secure a place, RSVP to Katie Cornish at katie.cornish@lexisnexis.co.uk. Follow @HLEThinkTank for updates.

Issue: 7581 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll