header-logo header-logo

02 August 2007 / C I Howells
Issue: 7284 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

A hidden trap?

What happens when there is not enough money to satisfy legacies and devise? C I Howells reports

One of the most common tasks for any private client solicitor is to advise a testator who wishes to provide for: (i) his wife or partner; and (ii) his children, or other beneficiaries. Everyone wishes to pay as little inheritance tax (IHT) as possible.

For the purposes of this article, I shall assume that the particular case is one where the total estate is likely to exceed the “nil-rate band” (NRB), currently £300,000: see the Finance Act 2005, s 98. Past experience indicates that the figure is subject to annual increase.

Probably the commonest solution is for the will to provide for the children or other beneficiaries to be given “the maximum amount of cash which I can give without incurring any liability to Inheritance Tax” (or similar words), ie the NRB, and for the wife or partner to be given the residuary estate—probably including the testator’s estate or interest in the matrimonial or quasi-matrimonial home.

A gift by will to one’s spouse will normally be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Aggressive sales tactics can add up to fraudulent trading even without proof of a particular deception or financial loss
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll