header-logo header-logo

01 March 2012 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7503 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

A heroic journalist

Geoffrey Bindman QC celebrates Daniel Isaac Eaton: a champion of free expression

As the Leveson inquiry examines the misdeeds of some media organisations, with a view to some form of regulation, it is as well to be reminded of the courage of journalists and publishers who resisted the efforts of past governments to regulate and restrict press freedom. We must not forget our long history in Britain of governments using law to suppress dissent. Leveson beware!

Daniel Isaac Eaton, born in 1753, went to prison for publishing the works of Tom Paine. In the aftermath of the French Revolution, he was the leading printer of pamphlets advocating democratic reform. He vigorously defied the efforts of the government to silence him. Between 1793 and 1812 he was prosecuted no less than eight times.

It was a dangerous time for those who sympathised with the aims of the French republicans, even if like Eaton they opposed the use of violence. The government of William Pitt responded to the alarm of the upper classes with repression. Radical publishers were a particular target.

In 1790 Edmund Burke

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll