header-logo header-logo

Guideline hourly rates: the wrong approach?

27 June 2014
Issue: 7612 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lowering guideline hourly rates (GHRs) is not the best way to contain litigation costs, according to a senior litigation lawyer.

The Master of the Rolls is expected to announce new rates this summer. They have not been reviewed since 2010.

However, Richard Langley, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Bircham Dyson Bell, writes in NLJ this week that a better approach would be to simplify procedures for determining costs.

Langley, a committee member of the LSLA, says: “Since there can be little doubt that the cost to law firms of providing legal services will generally have increased since 2010, it follows that any reductions in the GHRs must be the product of a judicial policy objective to reduce the costs of litigation.”

The Jackson review said little about GHRs, he points out, and a “procedure-light regime” for litigants could be preferable to the “blunt tool” of judge-set rates.

 

Issue: 7612 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure...

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn Premium Content

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS
Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need
Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are...
Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual...
Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need
Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver,...
back-to-top-scroll