header-logo header-logo

04 September 2019
Issue: 7854 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Guidance for judges on research

The Judicial Office has issued guidance for judges asked to take part in research into the judicial process or other aspects of court administration or procedure.

It advises that research applications will not normally be accepted from secondary school students, undergraduates, or those undertaking post-graduate masters and other taught courses. Nor would they normally be accepted from foreign research applications.

According to the guidance, the head of division or senior presiding judge approving participation must ensure that the research is in the public interest, and that taking part will not impair judicial discretion and independence, or draw judges into areas of political controversy. The research must also not place an undue burden on the judge, identify any judge, or require the judge to comment on the merits of individual cases.

 

Issue: 7854 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll