header-logo header-logo

16 February 2021
Issue: 7921 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Legal aid focus , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Fund criminal defence firms or lose them, ministers told

Failure to increase pay puts criminal legal aid system at risk of collapse

The structure of criminal defence firms is at risk of collapse and urgently needs investment, the Law Society has warned.

There has been a steady decline in numbers of firms in the past decade―as of 1 February 2021, there were 1,109 firms holding a criminal legal aid contract, 752 fewer than in 2011. However, the COVID-19 pandemic is now heaping fresh pressure on solicitors.

HM Courts and Tribunals figures for the week ending 24 January showed 56,003 outstanding cases in the Crown courts and 474,220 in the magistrates’ courts. The latest Nightingale court, a Taunton venue that will host both a Crown court and magistrates’ court, began hearing cases this week―bringing the total number of temporary courtrooms now in operation to 42.

David Greene, Law Society president said: ‘An increase in capacity is essential to meet the growing Crown court backlog but swift further investment on a much greater scale is required to make inroads into the growing problem.

‘Backlogs mean that justice is being delayed for victims, witnesses and defendants, who have proceedings hanging over them for months, if not years, with trials listed for 2022 and, reportedly, even 2023. Given the ongoing pandemic, Nightingale courts are the best way to boost capacity to tackle the backlog while keeping court users as safe as possible.’

He called for legal aid practitioners to be paid properly and for their area of business to be economically sustainable, or the system would ‘collapse’.

‘It is alarming but not surprising to see the decline in the number of criminal legal aid firms over the past decade given the lack of government support they have received,’ Greene said.

‘While the second part of the criminal legal aid review is now under way and will hopefully provide the structural increase in resources needed for the long-term sustainability of the sector, any benefits from it are some way off. We have consistently called on the government to recognise the consistent failure to increase payments for over 20 years and that an immediate increase is a necessity to provide criminal defence solicitors with the additional funds they so desperately need.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll