header-logo header-logo

31 July 2009 / James Pike , Naomi Greenwood
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

Fit to work?

Prevention is better than cure say James Pike & Naomi Greenwood

Cheltenham Borough Council has lost it £1m claim against its former managing director, Christine Laird, and have confirmed they will not appeal the decision (see Cheltenham Borough Council v Christine Laird [2009] EWHC 1253 (QB), [2009] All ER (D) 188 (Jun)). This news brings to an end a long-running saga that has come at considerable cost. For tax payers in Cheltenham this equates to approximately £750,000 in legal costs (both the council’s and a proportion of Mrs Laird’s).

In the aftermath of the High Court’s judgment we explore how this situation arose and what steps the council could have taken to prevent it.

Mrs Laird was appointed as managing director of this Conservative-controlled council in 2002. However, within four months the Liberal Democrats had taken over and the relationship between Mrs Laird and the new leader, Andrew McKinlay, became increasingly strained.

The fallout was very public and Mrs Laird issued a claim alleging harassment and seeking an injunction preventing Cllr McKinlay from entering the floor where her office was located

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll