header-logo header-logo

17 December 2019
Issue: 7869 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Firms must focus to attract clients

Law firms are investing heavily in online marketing but continue to suffer from lack of focus and poor prospect targeting

The ‘boiling the ocean’ approach to marketing, where firms pursue too many opportunities, is hampering business development, according to the LexisNexis InterAction’s global marketing and business development 2019 survey, published this week. Other obstacles to growth include failure to follow up on opportunities that do arise and heavy competition in the market.

Collaboration between different departments within firms is another weak spot, although it is improving―42% of survey respondents (compared to 56% in 2018) cited ‘cross-firm collaboration’ as their top challenge. However, this should be balanced against the fact 52% of 2019 respondents rated their collaboration as ‘successful’.

Collaboration with the IT department is increasing as firms place greater emphasis on digital marketing and prospective clients request information on the firm’s technology. Some 70% of law firms expect to invest more in website and social media in 2020. However, their online activities lack focus and fail to target business opportunities.

For example, a mere 9% use analytics to track business opportunities over the lifecycle of a client relationship, although 42% of respondents mentioned analytics as a major investment initiative.

‘As technology continues to support marketing and business development initiatives and reporting capabilities, IT is becoming a strategic partner for helping drive growth among top law firms,’ said Meghan Frank, Global Director of Marketing, LexisNexis Legal & Professional Software Solutions.

‘Improved technology integration combined with actionable data greatly enrich client engagement and can help firms grow new business development opportunities.’

As was the case in the previous two years, just under half of US firms and a quarter of Europe and Asia Pacific firms described their business development efforts as successful.

‘While most firms are using technology to maintain client data, many are still not using it to create the insights needed to drive better decisions, improve client service and create focused firm growth strategies,’ said Scott Wallingford, VP and General Manager of LexisNexis Software Solutions.

‘Leveraging client data will help overcome these challenges, providing critical insights to focus business development planning efforts and ultimately achieve improved client service and firm growth.’

The survey was conducted between August and October 2019 among 103 Big Law executives in the US, Europe and Asia Pacific.

Issue: 7869 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll