header-logo header-logo

08 April 2022
Issue: 7974 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Profession , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Finally…no-fault divorce

Family lawyers have hailed the new era of fault-free divorce, which takes effect this week after decades of campaigning

The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 removes the need to prove marriage breakdown by the fact of adultery or unreasonable behaviour or require the couple to have lived apart for two or five years. This is ‘an important change in the law, and a significant change in the language that will now be used, which will be invaluable in changing the public perception of one party having to be to blame for the breakdown of the relationship’, said Simon Donald, partner at Cripps Pemberton Greenish.

Graham Coy, head of family at Wilsons Solicitors, anticipated some people might ignore the mediator’s advice to consult a lawyer and end up not seeking legal advice until their divorce was at an advanced stage. He also predicted ‘a trend in simple cases becoming unnecessarily complicated’ where people ran into problems after attempting to ‘navigate the legal landscape without legal advice’.

Family lawyers have reported clients choosing to wait for the ‘no-fault’ option to become available. Zoe Porter, partner at Ashfords said she expects ‘a surge in applications’ but also some delays. 

‘With so much of the country suffering the effects of COVID, most sectors are experiencing staff shortages and the court system is no different,’ she said. 

‘We are already experiencing long delays in the process of applications (and the listing of hearings depending on where in the country you are based) and I can see this continuing for the foreseeable future.’

Research by law firm Fladgate shows one in two divorcees would have plumped for a no-fault divorce had it been an option at the time (70% of men and 40% of women).

More than one quarter (28%) believed fault-free divorce would have made their split less acrimonious.

Fladgate partner Hetty Gleave said: ‘It is anticipated that this will help to ease up the pressure placed on the already stretched court system in England and Wales, who will be freed from entering into the quagmire of marital “he said/she said” and attributing blame for the breakdown of marriages.’

Issue: 7974 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Profession , Divorce
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll