header-logo header-logo

11 November 2011 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7489 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Figure it out

Dominic Regan sails into the latest developments on costs in Trafigura

It was certain that Trafigura would end up in the Court of Appeal having regards to the level of costs claimed. We now have the comprehensive judgment of the court: Motto and others v Trafigura Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1150, [2011] All ER (D) 138 (Oct).

Large bill

With a gift for the understatement, the master of the rolls suggested that the defendant was “dismayed” to receive a bill for £104,707,772. The litigation arose out of an incident in August 2006, when the defendant discharged toxic materials from a ship in Africa. Ultimately, 29,614 claimants came forward. Despite allegations of dire injury and damage it transpired that the victims had sustained mild flu-like symptoms. A settlement package of £30m was eventually agreed.

Influence of early admission

There are many important lessons for all litigators in this case. The first and foremost is that it is wise for a defendant to admit liability at the earliest opportunity. The defendant failed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll