header-logo header-logo

Fake house sale alert

18 May 2018
Issue: 7793 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud
printer mail-detail

Court holds that solicitors can be liable in house scam cases

Solicitors on both sides can be held responsible for losses incurred in fake house sale scams, according to a landmark Court of Appeal judgment in two joined cases.

Dreamvar UK v Mishcon de Reya & Mary Monson Solicitors [2018] EWCA Civ 1082 concerned property developer Dreamvar’s purchase of a £1.1m mews house. Mishcon acted for the buyer. Mary Monson acted for the vendor. Neither solicitor ever met the vendor, who took fake identity documents to a third firm of solicitors for certification on behalf of Mary Monson.

Only once the sale exchanged and completed was it discovered that the vendor was a fraudster who had impersonated the real owner.

Dreamvar sued Mishcon for negligence and breach of trust and claimed against Mary Monson for breaches of warranty of authority, trust and undertaking. Mishcon claimed against Mary Monson for breaches of trust, undertaking and agency agreement.

The Court of Appeal agreed that Mishcon had acted honestly and reasonably, which meant the court could grant relief against the firm’s breach of trust. However, it declined to do so in view of the catastrophic effect of the fraud on Dreamvar.

The court also found Mary Monson liable for a breach of undertaking, and ordered both firms to share the liability to Dreamvar.

Jerome O’Sullivan, partner at Healys, who acted for Dreamvar, said: ‘Solicitors should review the terms and conditions of their retainers in light of this ruling.

‘When acting for the purchaser, solicitors should make it expressly clear that they will rely on the vendor’s solicitor’s reasonable checks to verify the identity of their client. When acting for the vendor, solicitors should review their exclusion clauses.’

In the second case, solicitors Owen White & Catlin (OWC), who acted for a fraudulent seller, were held liable to repay property company P&P more than £1m that it paid for a property. OWC were found to have held the money on trust for P&P and transferred it in breach of trust since no genuine completion took place.

Issue: 7793 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn Premium Content

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

back-to-top-scroll