header-logo header-logo

15 September 2013 / Alec Samuels
Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

The Erskine example: reader response

Erskine has been long recognised as our greatest advocate...

What a pity that Sir Geoffrey Bindman QC saw fit to belittle Erskine and advocacy, the alleged limitations of oral advocacy as an instrument of justice (The Erskine example). Bindman is a solicitor, an able and successful solicitor, who has successfully briefed and supported many fine advocates.

Erskine has been long recognised as our greatest advocate. Brilliant in court, he passionately promoted the integrity and sovereignty of the jury, freedom of speech and freedom of the press, and parliamentary reform. He never shrank from defending unpopular clients such as Tom Paine and Warren Hastings.

"From the moment that any advocate can be permitted to say that he will or will not stand between the Crown and the subject arraigned in the court where he daily sits to practise, from that moment the liberties of England are at an end."

At a time of grave threat to England from the French revolution and the army and navy of Napoleon, when "security" was understandably tight, Erskine upheld the independence of the English Bar. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll