header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
13 May 2016
Issue: 7698 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Gibbs v Leeds United Football Club Ltd [2016] EWHC 960 (QB), [2016] All ER (D) 206 (Apr)

The Queen’s Bench Division held that the claimant was constructively dismissed, by reason of a repudiatory breach of contract by his employer Leeds United Football Club and therefore was entitled to damages for that breach less the amount of any bonuses to be received in respect of his current job.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
TheGazette LogoClick to know more
Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
Read All
Pro Bono Week marks silver jubilee
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
NLJ this week: When hard selling becomes fraud
Aggressive sales tactics can add up to fraudulent trading even without proof of a particular deception or financial loss
NLJ this week: Time for judges to break their silence?
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
NLJ this week: Discounted damages, different costs
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
NLJ this week: Masks off—but police must follow the rules
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll