header-logo header-logo

13 November 2019
Issue: 7864 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Training & education
printer mail-detail

Concerns as SQE enters final run

The Junior Lawyers Division (JLD) has warned that the Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) ‘poses significant risks to the standing and credibility (both domestically and internationally) of the solicitor qualification’.

In a letter to the Legal Services Board last week, outgoing JLD chair Amy Clowrey expressed ‘support, in principle’ of the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s decision to overhaul the current system and ‘develop a consistent centralised standard’. However, the JLD, which has about 70,000 members, has concerns about the structure of the SQE, and wants to see more consultation take place.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has said it will apply in summer 2020 to the Legal Services Board for final approval of the SQE, which would eventually replace the Legal Practice Course.

In a separate letter to the Welsh Language Commissioner, Clowrey offered to work with her to ensure the SQE is offered in Welsh. The Solicitors Regulation Authority had initially said it would offer a Welsh language version provided parity of standard between the two versions could be achieved and the cost was not exorbitant. The regulator said last month that it would be too expensive and disproportionate to offer a Welsh SQE.

Clowrey also wrote to the Justice Select Committee urging further scrutiny of the SQE, which is ‘by no means a foregone conclusion’. She cited concerns that the exam would ‘dilute the standard of the solicitor qualification in England and Wales (thus making it less appealing as the jurisdiction of choice post-Brexit)’, including excepts from the 2016 consultation responses of Clyde & Co, Linklaters and The Association of Law Teachers. She highlighted, in particular, fears that the multiple choice questions element of the SQE was too easy.

Switalskis associate Clowrey, whose practice specialises in abuse claims, stepped down as chair last week. The new chair is Charlotte Parkinson, litigation associate at Addleshaw Goddard.

Issue: 7864 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Training & education
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll