header-logo header-logo

Causation & the ‘but for’ test

28 June 2024 / Ian Gascoigne
Issue: 8077 / Categories: Features , Judicial line , Tort
printer mail-detail
179410
Ian Gascoigne explains how judges have shaped this simple but sometimes ‘inadequate’ test
  • Discusses case law showing the use of the ‘but for’ test as a ‘strong but not rigid’ guide to assessing liability in tort, and to determine liability for a loss following breach of a duty.

Causation, the requirement for a victim of a tort to show how loss was caused to them, is familiar ground in breach of duty claims. It bridges the gap between breach of an obligation or duty and loss. Lawyers tend to address the first, proving that someone is in the wrong, while victims focus more usually on the second—what they have lost.

One problem is that a victim’s view of responsibility for loss may not fit the legal one. Along with duty and remoteness, the causation test is a dividing line between somebody having legal responsibility and avoiding it.

As an illustration, in Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee [1969] 1 QB 428, [1968] 1 All ER 1068, a man negligently sent home from hospital without being examined

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn Premium Content

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

back-to-top-scroll