header-logo header-logo

14 October 2010
Issue: 7437 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Capital gains

London leading the way on arbitration

London is the preferred seat of arbitration among global corporate counsel, new research shows.

Four out of 10 corporate counsel say they use English law most frequently, followed by 17% who use New York law, according to a major survey, Choices in International Arbitration, published by  Queen Mary, University of London (QMUL).

“Formal legal infrastructure” is the strongest influence on choice of seat, and London is the most preferred seat of arbitration (30%), followed by Geneva (9%), Paris, Tokyo and Singapore (each 7%) and New York (6%). Respondents have the most negative perception of Moscow and Mainland China. 

The International Chamber of Commerce (ILL) is the most preferred and widely used arbitration institution (50%), although there was a perception among a majority of interviewees that ICC arbitration is too expensive and that arbitration institutions in general are costly.

Professor Loukas Mistelis, director of the School of International Arbitration at QMUL, says: “[The survey] shows that corporations exercise strong preferences regarding the law that governs disputes and London comes out as a clear winner as the preferred seat of arbitration, which is consistent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll