header-logo header-logo

29 July 2010 / Paul Smethurst
Issue: 7428 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Bribery , Profession
printer mail-detail

Buyer beware

Paul Smethurst examines the impact & implications of the new Bribery Act

Picture the scene—pine and glass boardroom, champagne and smiles all around. With economic recovery being driven by consolidation you have just successfully assisted your corporate client in the acquisition of a company that will open up new overseas markets, the possibility of government work and access to a team of people who, if lifestyle is anything to go on, are clearly very successful.

Six months on and the mood has changed. Your client has discovered a culture where the “bung” is king in terms of both winning new work and appointing suppliers and wants to know what you did during the deal transaction process to ensure compliance with the Bribery Act 2010 as some very friendly people from the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) are coming in for a chat and by the way who is your PI insurer?

The Bribery Act 2010 received Royal Assent in April and its provisions are expected to come into force in April 2011. As well as individual offences in respect of bribing, being bribed and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Aggressive sales tactics can add up to fraudulent trading even without proof of a particular deception or financial loss
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll