header-logo header-logo

07 October 2022
Issue: 7998 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession , Covid-19 , Brexit , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Bubble & pop: Growth opportunities in the legal market

The past two years of growth in the legal market could be a bubble, which is about to pop, according to the latest LexisNexis Gross Legal Product (GLP) Index.

LexisNexis this week published an updated GLP Index, focusing solely on the corporate, commercial and competition segments of the legal market. It predicts these areas of law will slow ‘significantly’ through to 2024, with the rate of growth likely to equal what it was before COVID-19.

The LexisNexis GLP Index is inspired by the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) but pulls data from a broad range of sources to measure growth across multiple practice areas from Q1 2016 through to predictions for Q1 of 2024.

The latest update suggests that, after a ferocious post-COVID return to growth, the market will cool down substantially. It cites new challenges including rising inflation, new regulations and sanctions, while the threat of a recession appears to have stagnated growth in some practice areas.

It predicts a 22% decline in demand for corporate law by the end of 2022, as compared to 2021. This follows a surge in activity last year due to pent-up demand.

For commercial lawyers, their workloads will have risen by a mere 1% by the end of this year, as compared to 2021, although it will rise again in 2023 due to a rebound in activity for imports and exports, foreign investments and new companies being created.

However, it predicts 17% growth in competition law for the full 2022 year in comparison to 2021, and forecasts growth of 32% for the whole of 2023 as compared to this year. It attributes this increased workload to Brexit, the Competition and Markets Authority’s heightened stance towards competition enforcement and new security and sustainability measures coming into play.

Dylan Brown, the Index report’s editor, said: ‘The GLP Index is useful in highlighting areas of the law that are growing or falling in demand. 

‘It gives law firms and in-house teams some helpful hints as to where they could invest or reposition their resources. However, it is purely prediction, as we have drawn conclusions from publicly available data.

‘Today’s economically uncertain times have caused a great deal of unrest in the corporate world. There’s a constant barrage of conflicting reports coming out, and despite everything still being up in the air, the default setting for most businesses right now will be risk aversion.

‘It will be up to lawyers to instil confidence by guiding clients through the months and years ahead with accurate insights on economic activity, new legislation and regulations, and worthwhile growth opportunities.’

The report can be found here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll