header-logo header-logo

04 December 2020
Issue: 7914 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Bellwether: confidence beginning to return

Small and medium law firms are regaining their confidence as the impact of COVID-19 begins to ease, but one in four are making cuts and 40% are changing their practice area base, according to the latest 2020 Bellwether Report

The report, ‘COVID-19: the next chapter’, by LexisNexis, is the second Bellwether to study the impact of the pandemic. The survey was conducted with 120 lawyers at firms with fewer than 21 fee-earners. It found that, six months on from the first lockdown, the worst effects have started to lessen and four out of five firms now believe they will be in business for the long term.

However, 23% are implementing cuts, compared to only 4% during the first lockdown.

Brexit and regulatory compliance continue to weigh heavily on lawyers’ minds. However, nearly half the respondents said Covid was their biggest worry (down from 63% in the previous 2020 Bellwether) and, with home working now the norm, 58% said staff welfare was their biggest concern.

The move to home working has been largely successful. However, it has led to feelings of isolation and a lack of motivation for three out of four lawyers. Despite this, more than two-thirds of the lawyers surveyed believed their work quality had improved or stayed the same.

One of the challenges of home working is lack of communication or miscommunication. Only one quarter saw this as a problem back in March, when home working was just getting underway. In this second survey, however, this number had risen to 44%, suggesting it is an urgent business problem for firms. 

The report found: ‘Lack of management direction and supervision were also considered to be increasing issues since the first lockdown.

‘Young lawyers, in particular, who perhaps typically rely on colleagues for morale and training, said they were feeling increasingly isolated as the crisis has deepened.’

Some 40% of firms were changing their practice base to become either more generalist or more specialist, with the majority of these choosing to specialise.

Marin Daley, small law lead at LexisNexis, said: ‘Law firms have worked exceptionally hard over the last six months to continue practicing and supporting their clients. The relief and positivism in this latest Bellwether is notable. However, it is clear that with one problem receding, the future is still uncertain.’

View the full Bellwether report at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk/Bellwether2020.

Issue: 7914 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll