header-logo header-logo

13 May 2021
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Charities , Training & education
printer mail-detail

Awards celebrate pro bono student stars

Aspiring young lawyers were celebrated at the 15th LawWorks and Attorney General Student Pro Bono Awards in a virtual ceremony on Wednesday 12 May.

Among the 2021 winners were the student leaders of the Cardiff Innocence Project, which won the award for best contribution by a team of students, and The Protea Clinic at King's College London—a specialist service providing advice to vulnerable migrant females—which was recognised as best new pro bono activity. King’s student Amanda Ignatia, volunteer director of the Human Rights and Environment Legal Clinic, was selected for the best contribution by an individual, and Nottingham Law School Legal Advice Centre won best contribution by a law school. Bangor Law School took home the Access to Justice Foundation award.

The judging panel for the 2021 awards included former Law Society president Simon Davis, head of civil law policy at the Ministry of Justice Peter Farr, and Leanne Targett-Parker, chair of the Bar Council Pro Bono Committee.

The Attorney General Michael Ellis QC, who presented the awards, said: ‘I am thrilled to continue this valuable tradition alongside LawWorks to recognise and award the brilliant contributions to pro bono and public legal education by students across the country… I wish everyone involved the very best in their future endeavours, and offer my congratulations to all of the winners.’

LawWorks chair Alasdair Douglas, said: ‘LawWorks received a large number of high-calibre nominations and the quality and impact of the projects nominated was hugely impressive and inspiring—all those nominated or shortlisted deserve congratulations and appreciation for their work. The judges had a difficult task—but special congratulations to this year’s winners of the LawWorks and Attorney General Student Pro Bono Awards.’ 

James Harper, legal director of global projects and senior counsel for LexisNexis, which sponsored the awards, said: ‘Our business is all about the Rule of Law—it is in every product, tool and solution we provide. And so it is our privilege to continue our long-standing support for those students and law schools working to improve access to justice and advance the Rule of Law. 

‘In such a challenging year, it was incredible to see such a range of high quality, innovative and inspiring entries. Our congratulations go to the winners and to all those nominated, with our heartfelt thanks for all they do in delivering vital pro bono work across the country!’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll