header-logo header-logo

05 December 2019 / Karishma Paroha
Issue: 7867 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Automated vehicles: liability, intangibles & satellite litigation

12725
Karishma Paroha outlines FOIL’s response to the Law Commissions’ joint consultation on automated vehicles
  • Limitation, interpretation and application: ensuring the safe deployment of driving automation.

The Law Commission of England and Wales and the Scottish Law Commission (the Law Commissions) have now published two joint consultations on automated vehicles.

The first paper published in November 2018 focused on safety assurance, civil and criminal liability, including contributory negligence as defined within the Automated and Electric Vehicles Act 2018 (AEV 2018), and data retention (see ‘Automated Vehicles: A joint preliminary consultation paper’). The Law Commissions also considered manufacturer’s liability, focusing on product liability under the Consumer Protection Act 1987 (CPA 1987). The second paper, published in October 2019, focused on passenger services (see ‘Automated Vehicles: Consultation Paper 2 on Passenger Services and Public Transport’).

In April 2019, EU commissioner Violeta Bulc said that by 2030 ‘we will have the new generation of vehicles that will be fully automated’. However, the Forum of Insurance Lawyers (FOIL) has warned that there are currently too many questions left unanswered in regards to product liability for automated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll