header-logo header-logo

28 January 2010 / Roger Smithers
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Appeal to reason

Roger Smithers resolves some Pt 52 conundrums

Anyone contemplating a second tier civil appeal would do well to reflect carefully on the provisions of the Civil Procedure Rules before embarking on the process. Indeed, in this article it is suggested that the meaning and full effect of Pt 52 of the CPR with regard to the requirement for permission is not as clear as it might be.

If this seems a surprising view after some nine years under the new regime, consider this: most practitioners will be aware that permission to appeal is generally required. What is not so widely appreciated is that there can only be one application for permission to appeal to any one appeal court in the same proceedings. If that is refused, that is the end of the line. 

The CPR

Rule 52.3 deals with permission and provides:
(2) An application for permission to appeal may be made-
(a) to the lower court at the hearing at which the decision to be appealed  was made; or
(b) to the appeal court in an appeal notice.
(3) Where the lower court refuses an application

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Aggressive sales tactics can add up to fraudulent trading even without proof of a particular deception or financial loss
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll