header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 161, Issue 7480

07 September 2011
IN THIS ISSUE

Jon Robins anticipates the impact of legal aid reforms on family law

Christopher Stephens presents the case for solicitor judges

Jennifer Lee assesses the level of obligation owed by employers to former employees

John McMullen examines fairness in redundancy selection cases

Andrew Chesser explores the thorny issue of obtaining landlord’s consent

Angus Nurse welcomes proposals to reform the public services ombudsmen

Michael Tringham reports on a successful challenge

What tactics are available to defendants to challenge ATE premiums in legacy claims, asks Tina Campbell

Lisa Carkeek highlights the importance of will construction

James Arrowsmith surveys the costs landscape & the demise of Carver

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll