header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 167, Issue 7729

13 January 2017
IN THIS ISSUE

Reverend Canon Pemberton v Right Reverend Richard Inwood UKEAT/0072/16/BA, [2016] All ER (D) 80 (Dec)

Siddiqui v University of Oxford [2016] EWHC 3150 (QB), [2016] All ER (D) 57 (Dec)

Roderick Ramage explains why life assurance & automatic enrolment might be bad for you

    Kateb v Howard de Walden Estates Ltd and another [2016] EWCA Civ 1176, [2016] All ER (D) 42 (Dec)

     

    David Burrows discusses anonymity for children & others involved in family proceedings in his final article on contempt

    Art 127 to be focus of new Brexit High Court case

    Show
    10
    Results
    Results
    10
    Results

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

    Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

    Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

    Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

    Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

    International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

    Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

    Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

    Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

    NEWS
    Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
    The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
    A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
    After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
    Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
    back-to-top-scroll