header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card

Issue: Vol 166, Issue 7723

18 November 2016
IN THIS ISSUE

Re Ellison (A Bankrupt); Hicken (as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Ellison) v Ellison [2016] EWHC 2791 (Ch), [2016] All ER (D) 76 (Nov)

Roderick Ramage reworks William Shakespeare in bite-size format

Re Pablo Star Ltd Price v Registrar of Companies and another [2016] EWHC 2640 (Ch), [2016] All ER (D) 66 (Nov)

Christopher Hutton & Aniko Adam examine the implications of Brexit for UK competition law

    Roger Smith reports on the rise & rise of digital technology

    AS v TH and others [2016] EWHC 2825 (Fam), [2016] All ER (D) 77 (Nov)

    Watts v Secretary of State for Health [2016] EWHC 2835 (QB), [2016] All ER (D) 78 (Nov)

    Zoya Ltd v Ahmed (t/a Property Mart) [2016] EWHC 2249 (Ch), [2016] All ER (D) 75 (Nov)

    Fee remission less painful; divorce competitions & civil appeal form changes

    Tamsin Cox & Julia Petrenko examine a useful authority for freeholders of residential buildings in relation to Airbnb

    Show
    10
    Results
    Results
    10
    Results

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Anthony Collins—20 promotions

    Anthony Collins—20 promotions

    20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

    Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

    Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

    Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

    Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

    Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

    Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

    NEWS
    The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
    Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
    Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
    Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
    A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
    back-to-top-scroll