header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card

Issue: Vol 165, Issue 7654

29 May 2015
IN THIS ISSUE

Re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (in administration); subnom Joint Administrators of LB Holdings Intermediate 2 Ltd (in administration) and others v Lomas and others [2015] EWCA Civ 485, [2015] All ER (D) 139 (May)

Brown v London Borough of Haringey [2015] EWCA Civ 483, [2015] All ER (D) 126 (May)

Dransfield v Information Commission and another; Craven v Information Commissioner and another [2015] EWCA Civ 454, [2015] All ER (D) 132 (May)

Members of the armed forces should have recourse to the courts, argues Richard Scorer

Haile v Waltham Forest London Borough [2015] UKSC 34, [2015] All ER (D) 173 (May)

Rhodes v OPO (by his litigation friend) and another [2015] UKSC 32, [2015] All ER (D) 177 (May)

Does lack of clarity in the legal aid scheme prevent access to justice, asks David Burrows

How has Lawrence v Fen Tigers Ltd been treated at first instance, asks Andrew Francis

Société Coopérative de Production SeaFrance S.A. v Competition and Markets Authority and another [2015] EWCA Civ 487, [2015] All ER (D) 146 (May)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll